Home
HomeAbout The ShowShow ArchivesListen NowListen NowPhotosFan ToolkitFriendsContact

August 1st, 2011
Tea Party Freshman Went to Capitol Hill


While the details of the debt ceiling deal remain fuzzy, this much is clear: Barack Obama may be president, but the Tea Party is now running Washington. How did this happen? Simple; this is what American politics looks like when thereís no left-wing movement and no war.

Letís start with the first point. Liberals are furious that President Obama agreed to massive spending cuts, and the promise of more, without any increase in revenues. They should be: Given how much the Bush tax cuts have contributed to the deficit (and how little theyíve spurred economic growth), itís mind-boggling that theyíve apparently escaped this deficit-reduction deal unscathed.

Obama, like FDR, had a reasonably successful first two years: a stimulus package that while too small for the circumstances was still large by historical standards and a health care bill that while subpar in myriad ways still far exceeded the efforts of other recent Democratic presidents.

And then, unlike FDR, he ran into a grassroots movement of the right.

Historians will long debate why the financial collapse of 2008 produced a right-wing populist movement and not a left-wing one.

Perhaps itís because Obama didnít take on Wall Street, perhaps itís because with labor unions so weak thereís just not the organizational muscle to create such a movement, perhaps itís because trust in government is so low that pro-government populism is almost impossible.

Whatever the reason, it was the emergence of the Tea Party as the most powerful grassroots pressure group in America that laid the groundwork for Sunday nightís deal.

The fact that polling showed Obama getting the better of the debt ceiling debate barely mattered. The 2010 elections brought to Congress a group of Republicans theologically committed to cutting government. And they have proved more committed, or perhaps just more reckless, than anyone else in Washington.

 The Tea Party, by contrast, is a post-war on terror phenomenon. Many of the newly-elected Republicans are indifferent, if not hostile, to the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Theyíre happy to cut the defense budget, especially since cutting the defense budget makes it easier to persuade Democrats to swallow larger cuts in domestic spending.

Itís the reverse of the cold war dynamic. During the cold waróespecially in the Nixon and Reagan years--conservatives accepted that overall spending would go up in order to ensure that some that increase went to defense. Today, conservatives accept defense cuts in order to ensure that overall spending goes down.

The good news is that the Tea Party, more than Barack Obama, has now ended the neoconservative dream of an ever-expanding American empire.

Given the era of fiscal scarcity weíre now entering, those neocon and progressive dreams are now likely dead for many years to come. Meanwhile, the Tea Partyís dream of a government reduced to its pre-welfare state size becomes ever real. 

 

(Source)


Back

Comments:


rcbxaoy - 2011-08-31
oyB9yF , [url=http://derbkoqnqlbq.com/]derbkoqnqlbq[/url], [link=http://deuyoprqbqjr.com/]deuyoprqbqjr[/link], http://vrktvhzblvxa.com/
by rcbxaoy

ryqrqyjh - 2011-08-26
vwzh85 qbykbpzveagl
by ryqrqyjh

jmcicamml - 2011-08-24
zUOmQI , [url=http://upnwywaiszfz.com/]upnwywaiszfz[/url], [link=http://ugwpgnilggvv.com/]ugwpgnilggvv[/link], http://hsqrcftcsywl.com/
by jmcicamml

ubsityjg - 2011-08-22
jekVZk oybmetrzgijc
by ubsityjg

Wind - 2011-08-22
Oh yeah, fabluous stuff there you!
by Wind



Submit a comment

Website & Contents © Walton & Johnson | Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Contact Us

Powered by BubbleUp, Ltd.

W&J on Twitter.comW&J on Facebook.com